Inscho v. Exide Corp.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Brazil, J.:
Heather Inscho sued Exide Corporation claiming breach of an implied employment contract. She appeals from the trial court’s grant of summaiy judgment to Exide. She contends that the trial court erred in deciding as a matter of law that no implied contract existed between her and Exide. She also contends that the trial court erred by ruling in the alternative, and as a matter of law, that if there was an implied contract, there was just cause to términate her. We affirm.
Inscho had worked for Exide since April 1997. Exide terminated her employment on December 23, 1998, for fighting…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Allegri v. Providence-St. Margaret Health CenterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
- Jackson Ex Rel. Essien v. Unified School District 259Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Kastner v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
- Stover v. Superior Industries International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2000
- Zeferjohn v. Shawnee County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Allen v. KlineDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- Forbes v. Kinder Morgan, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2016
- Litton v. Maverick Paper Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2005
- Creason v. Seaboard Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- Litton v. Maverick Paper Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.