Local 56, United Food & Commercial Workers Union v. Campbell Soup Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
BROTMAN, District Judge:
This class action arises out of Defendant Campbell Soup Company’s (“Defendant Company”) 1 unilateral reduction of health insurance benefits provided to retirees under the Company’s medical plan. The court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e). Presently before the Court is Defendant Company’s partial motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A. The Benefit Plan: 1965 — 1985
Defendant Company first determined it would provide…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. SchoonejongenSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mark Fritcher and Country Trust Bank v. Health Care Service CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Erlandson v. Liberty Life Assur. Co. of BostonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2004
- Stagi v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- ADIRZONE v. THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- Fritcher, Mark v. Health Care ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.