Florence Concrete Products, Inc. v. North Carolina Licensing Board for General Contractors
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN, Judge.
Respondent (the Licensing Board) appeals from the trial court’s order holding petitioner (Florence Concrete) did not meet the definition of “general contractor” under N.C.G.S. § 87-1 (1989) (amended 1992) and therefore was not required to obtain a North Carolina general contractor’s license in order to bid and perform bridge construction projects. The Licensing Board contends the trial court erred because Florence Concrete qualifies as a general contractor within the purview of the statute. We find this argument persuasive and reverse the trial court.
Florence Concrete, a South…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re the Appeal by McCraryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Brooks v. Rebarco, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Sherrod v. North Carolina Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Spivey & Self, Inc. v. Highview Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Mill-Power Supply Co. v. CVM ASSOCIATESCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Paving Equipment of the Carolinas Inc. v. M & N Development Co.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1995
- Florence Concrete Products, Inc. v. North Carolina Licensing Board for General ContractorsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995