Legal Opinion

Girard Life-insurance, Annuity & Trust Co. v. Loving

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 1905No. 14,157PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Sumner district court; Carroll L. Swarts, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

BURCH, J.:

The purpose of the action in the district court was to charge the defendant as a stockholder in a defunct corporation. The court held that the fact of stock ownership had not been established. The plaintiff assigns as error the rejection of certain evidence which it claims would have supplied the missing proof had it been admitted.

The books from which certain entries were offered in evidence were wholly unidentified as to the purpose for which they had been kept. There is nothing to indicate that the entries offered in evidence were correct,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hinsdale Savings Bank v. New Hampshire Banking Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1898
  2. Dolan, Drury & Co. v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Austin, Commissioner v. StrongTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Dagg v. HammonsArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  3. In Re Hull Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Bedenbaugh v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  5. Benton Grain Co. v. RegerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API