State v. Lard
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Defendant appeals his conviction of larceny of money in excess of $100.00 but not more than $2500.00. Section 40A-16-1, N.M.S.A. 1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 6). He also appeals his sentence as an habitual offender. Section 40A-29-5, N.M.S.A. 1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 6). The issues are: (1) sufficiency of the evidence as to the larceny; (2) admissibility of a statement allegedly privileged; and (3) propriety of the enhanced sentence.
The trial proceedings were tape recorded through the use of a four channel tape recorder. The parties stipulated that the appeal could be presented on…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- State v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. LujanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. MurrayNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. HernandezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Den-Gar Enterprises v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- State v. JacobsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. ArandaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- State v. BaldwinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.