Legal Opinion

State v. Tapie

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 30, 1931No. 31365PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOdom, J.

Defendant and Lawrence Bourg'were prosecuted for the crime of robbery. Both were convicted and sentenced to hard labor in the state penitentiary. The defendant Ashton Tapie appealed.

The errors complained of by appellant are set forth in two bills of exception. Defendant moved for a new trial on the ground that since his conviction he had discovered new evidence material to his defense. His motion was overruled, and bill No. 1 was reserved.

After conviction, he filed' a plea of present insanity, and asked that a lunacy commission examine him and make report to the court touching the question…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  2. Commonwealth v. StewartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. State v. FergusonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  5. State v. BrodesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ChinnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  2. State v. FrezalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  3. State v. FulghumSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
  4. State v. AlbertsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  5. State v. WhisenantSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API