Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 30, 1916No. 22221PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Daniel D. Moore was indicted for libel, and applies for writs of certiorari and prohibition.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, J.

The relator and one W. J. Leppert were indicted for libel by the grand jury of the parish of East Feliciana. Four indictments were presented, referring to four different publications that appeared in the Times-Picayune in its issues of date, respectively, the 13th, 14th, 15th, and 16th 'of February, 1916. Except as to the date of the alleged crime and the annexed printed clipping of the article complained of in each case, the indictments are alike. The alleged offense is charged in this language, viz.:

“That one D. D. Moore and W. J. Leppert, late of the parish of East Feliciana, within the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Press Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Giles v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1849
  3. Staub v. Van BenthuysenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
  4. In re DanaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1873
  5. State v. BassSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1903

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Age-Herald Pub. Co. v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. Eberhardt v. BarkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. State v. HoganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  5. State v. BriwaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API