Commonwealth v. Stewart
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is an indictment on which the defendant has been found guilty of murder in the first degree. The case comes before us under the practice established by St. 1925, c. 279.
The defendant has been permitted to introduce the testimony of a person, who qualified as an expert, to the effect that from an examination it was his opinion that the mental level of the defendant “would be somewhere around twelve *13years of age . . . that he was not insane nor feeble minded, but low grade mental capacity, just above the feeble minded level.” This evidence was suffered to remain in the case notwithstanding…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DascalakisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Commonwealth v. RussMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- People v. SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- State v. McCallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1843
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Ferguson v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Chatwin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Commonwealth v. McInerneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Commonwealth v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
- Commonwealth v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.