In Re Disbarment of Hughes
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
Respondent has been here before. 186 Minn. 204, 242 N. W. 711. These proceedings relate to another matter and have been initiated by the state board of law examiners. The board and Mr. Hughes have filed a stipulation as to the facts, from which it appears that on or about January 3,1924, respondent was appointed and qualified as the administrator of the estate of one Michael Wagner, deceased, and did not close the administration thereof until the fall of 1932.
The controlling fact before us is that respondent was short $10,036.32, having wrongfully converted that amount to his own use, which…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re Disbarment of Evan HughesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Disbarment of O. B. StrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935