Legal Opinion

In Re Disbarment of Hughes

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 17, 1933No. 29,397PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Respondent has been here before. 186 Minn. 204, 242 N. W. 711. These proceedings relate to another matter and have been initiated by the state board of law examiners. The board and Mr. Hughes have filed a stipulation as to the facts, from which it appears that on or about January 3,1924, respondent was appointed and qualified as the administrator of the estate of one Michael Wagner, deceased, and did not close the administration thereof until the fall of 1932.

The controlling fact before us is that respondent was short $10,036.32, having wrongfully converted that amount to his own use, which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Disbarment of Evan HughesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Disbarment of O. B. StrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API