Legal Opinion

In Re Disbarment of O. B. Strand

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 3, 1935No. 30,021PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Per, Curiam.

Complaint having been filed accusing the respondent of professional misconduct, the Honorable A. B. Gislason, a judge of the ninth judicial district, was appointed to take and report the evidence upon the charges filed and to find the facts. The said referee having heard the evidence adduced and filed his findings, the matter was argued and submitted in this court.

It appears that respondent was admitted to practice law in this state in 1909 and since that time has resided and practiced his profession at Kenyon. In-1931 he received, from attorneys in Nebraska, a claim of $82.50 for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Application for Removal of CherrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. In Re Disbarment of George H. Gerlich, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. In Re Disbarment of HughesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Application of Strand for Reinstatement to Practice LawSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API