Legal Opinion

In Re Disbarment of Evan Hughes

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 27, 1932No. 28,573PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

On the petition for rehearing the matter was rereferred to Honorable C. M. Tifft, judge of the eighth judicial district, for additional findings; and the same having been made and filed and the entire findings as now made resubmitted to this court for decision, the former opinion is withdrawn and the following filed in lieu thereof.

The principal charge of misconduct against respondent relates to his dealings with a Mrs. Wheatley and a Mrs. Garnhart in connection with a sale of a certain house and lot in Mankato. Respondent had been Mrs. Wheatley’s attorney in recovering the property and…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Disbarment of HughesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API