Legal Opinion
The Noddleburn
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided October 23, 1886PublishedCited by 18 opinions
In Admiralty. Suit for damages and wages.
1Opinion of the CourtDeady, J.
This suit is brought by the libelant, Daniel Curtis, against the British bark Noddleburn and her master, Joseph Hogg, to recover $5,000 damages for an injury to his ankle, received while serving on the vessel as a seaman, and for a balance of $70 due him as wages on account of such service.
From the pleadings and evidence I find the following facts:
On March 24, 1886, the libelant duly shipped on the Noddleburn, at Liverpool, for a voyage to this port, and tlience to a port of discharge in the United Kingdom, as an able-bodied seaman, at and for the monthly wages of 2 pounds and 15 shillings.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- The BelgenlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Dixon v. The CyrusDistrict Court, D. Pennsylvania · 1789
- Bernhard v. CreeneDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1874
3Cited by18 opinions
- Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Mahnich v. Southern Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- The Arizona v. AnelichSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Dutra Group v. BattertonSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.