Legal Opinion

Oneida Tribe of Indians v. VILLAGE OF HOBART

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided April 18, 2011No. Case 10-C-137PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH, District Judge.

In this action, Plaintiff Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin seeks declaratory and injunctive relief precluding the Village of Hobart from assessing a utility fee for land in the Village owned by the United States and held in trust for the Tribe. The Village filed a third-party complaint against the United States, including the United States Department of Interior and its Secretary Kenneth Salazar, in which it alleges that the Clean Water Act requires the United States to pay the Village’s storm water fees to the extent the Oneida are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Eduardo M. Perez v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections and Michael J. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  3. Darby v. CisnerosSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Center for Native Ecosystems v. CablesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  5. City of Shoreacres v. WaterworthDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Oneida Tribe of Indians v. Village of HobartDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API