Legal Opinion

Oneida Tribe of Indians v. Village of Hobart

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided September 5, 2012No. Case No. 10-C-137PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH, District Judge.

This case represents another battle in the ongoing conflict between the Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin and the Village of Hobart over the regulatory control of the land situated within their common boundaries. Plaintiff Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin (the Tribe) filed this action on February 19, 2010, seeking a declaratory judgment that the Village of Hobart (the Village) lacks authority to impose charges under its Storm Water Management Utility Ordinance on parcels of…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dekalb County, Georgia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  2. City of Chester v. PHCC LLC d/b/a Preston Hollow Community Capital, eUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  3. Robert Lee Harris and Misty HarrisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API