Legal Opinion

Miller v. Foster

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1943PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarlow, J.

Appellant contends that sec. 19.28 of the ordinance violates the “due-process” clauses of the state and federal constitutions, and is void and affords defendant no protection for serving notice on tenants to vacate the premises in question. This section provides as follows :

“Whenever any building or portion thereof is being used or occupied contrary to the provisions of this code, the building inspector shall order such use or occupancy discontinued and the building or portion thereof vacated by notice served on any person using or causing such use or occupancy to be continued and such person…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. City of Janesville v. CarpenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Lowe v. ConroyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. President of Waupun v. MooreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  5. State ex rel. Nowotny v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rottkamp v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  2. City of Appleton v. BrunschweilerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Joseph M. Baker v. George F. MuellerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
  4. Village of Wind Point v. HalversonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Baker v. MuellerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API