Legal Opinion
Carter Products, Inc. v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 7, 1958No. Civ. A. 6924PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs have now moved for an order holding defendant Colgate-Palmolive Company in contempt of the injunction issued against Colgate pursuant to Judge Coleman’s decision herein, D.C., 130 F. Supp. 557, as affirmed by the Court of Appeals, 4 Cir., 230 F.2d 855, certiorari denied 352 U.S. 843, 77 S.Ct. 43, 1 L.Ed. 2d 59. See also 4 Cir., 243 F.2d 163 and D.C., 151 F.Supp. 427. Plaintiffs Spitzer and Small are the owners of U. S. Patent No. 2,655,480, issued to Spitzer, et al., for a lather producing composition. Plaintiff Carter Products, Inc. is the holder of an…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rocks v. BrosiusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Carter Products, Inc. v. Colgate-Palmolive CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1963
- Bord v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Eversharp, Inc. v. Fisher Pen Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1961
- Carter Products, Inc., Joseph G. Spitzer, and Marvin Small v. Colgate-Palmolive CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.