Legal Opinion

People v. Savory

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 17, 1999No. 3-98-0765PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lytton

A jury convicted defendant Johnny Lee Savory on two counts of murder. Defendant subsequently filed a motion for scientific testing under section 116 — 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 (Code) (725 ILCS 5/116 — 3 (West 1998)). The trial court denied the motion. Defendant appeals, claiming that polymerase chain reaction amplification (PGR) testing, unavailable at the time of his trial, will produce materially relevant evidence of his “actual innocence.” We affirm.

I. FACTS

James Robinson and Connie Cooper were siblings, living together with their parents. On the morning of January 18,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Sawyer v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. WashingtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  5. People v. FriebergIllinois Supreme Court · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. People v. RobinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2020
  2. People v. SavoryIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In re PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2009
  4. People v. CollierAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  5. People v. BarnslaterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API