McSweeney v. Equitable Trust Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
Jayne, S. C. C.
This motion was made on behalf of the plaintiff for the allowance of a rale striking ont the answer filed by the defendant in this action. A precursory reference to the allegations of the complaint and to the averments of the answer suffices to exhibit the controversial points debated by counsel. Affidavits have been submitted which more definitely disclose the underlying factual situation but it is not observed that aim fact of influential legal significance is in dispute. The complaint alleges that on September 1st, 1933, tbe plaintiff was a depositor of the defendant…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- State Ex Rel. State Board of Milk Control v. Newark Milk Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- Treigle v. Acme Homestead Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Doty v. LoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Borough of Little Ferry v. Bergen County Sewer AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- In Re Collins-Doan Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Miele v. McGuireSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- State v. ShapiroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Greathouse v. Yakima Valley Bank & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.