State v. Frankfurth
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] The State appeals from the district court’s order arresting judgment and subsequent orders granting reconsideration and clarification pertaining to Paul R. Frankfurth’s conviction for gross sexual imposition. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Frankfurth was arraigned on March 24, 2004, under an information purporting to charge him with gross sexual imposition under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-20-03. The information alleged, “The defendant engaged in a sexual act at a time when the victim was unaware that a sexual act was being committed on her.” On December 3, 2004, a jury trial was held,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Montana v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Marion C. Denmon, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- State v. Howell & TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. BlueNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. BertramNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. BornerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. FrohlichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. FlattNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.