Legal Opinion

State v. Frankfurth

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 2005No. 20050112PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] The State appeals from the district court’s order arresting judgment and subsequent orders granting reconsideration and clarification pertaining to Paul R. Frankfurth’s conviction for gross sexual imposition. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Frankfurth was arraigned on March 24, 2004, under an information purporting to charge him with gross sexual imposition under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-20-03. The information alleged, “The defendant engaged in a sexual act at a time when the victim was unaware that a sexual act was being committed on her.” On December 3, 2004, a jury trial was held,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Montana v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. Marion C. Denmon, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  5. State v. Howell & TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. BlueNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. BertramNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. BornerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. FrohlichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. FlattNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API