Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Tjader (In Re Tjader)
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Dissent
ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J. (dissenting).
¶ 24 In spite of Attorney Tjader having received three prior reprimands, the court imposes yet another reprimand. 1 Accepting the recommendation of the referee, which in turn accepted the amended stipulation of the parties, it determines that a public reprimand is appropriate.
¶ 25 In justifying its decision, the court apparently is persuaded by the Office of Lawyer Regulation's (OLR) assurance that a public reprimand is the correct level of discipline. See per curiam, ¶ 16. I am not persuaded by OLR's assurance. Instead, for the reasons set forth below, I…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against NussbergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Godfrey Y. MuwongeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert W. HorschWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017