Legal Opinion

Britton v. Britton

District Court, D. Maine

Decided September 19, 2002No. 2:02-cv-00052PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SINGAL, District Judge.

An estranged husband, his business partner and their closely held Maine corporation claim that his wife violated federal and state wiretapping statutes and committed the tort of invasion of privacy by recording telephone calls to and from the corporate entity. Presently before the Court is Defendant wife’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, requesting that the Court abstain from accepting jurisdiction (Docket # 5). For the following reasons, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion.

I. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD

The Court treats Defendant’s…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Princess Lida of Thurn and Taxis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Fairway Capital Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2006
  2. ADVANTAGE PAYROLL SERVICES INC v. RODEDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API