Dittmann v. ACS Human Services LLC
District Court, N.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Philip P. Simon, Chief Judge, United States District Court
This employment-related dispute centers around a wellness program that required employees to provide certain medical information or potentially face an annual surcharge. William Dittmann did not provide the medical information for participation in the program and the results of that decision gave rise to this action against Dittmann’s employer (ACS Human Services), his employer’s affiliate (Xerox Business Services, LLC), and an alleged agent of Dittmann’s employer (Quest Diagnostics, Inc.). Dittmann alleges violations…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Syed M. Alam v. Miller Brewing CompCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Eddie Trail and Katrinka Trail v. Boys and Girls Clubs of Northwest IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gross v. The Peoples Gas Light and Coke CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- Taylor v. HixDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020
- Vazquez v. Allen County JailDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022