Legal Opinion

Dittmann v. ACS Human Services LLC

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided September 26, 2016No. CAUSE NO. 2:16-cv-16-PPS-PRCPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

Philip P. Simon, Chief Judge, United States District Court

This employment-related dispute centers around a wellness program that required employees to provide certain medical information or potentially face an annual surcharge. William Dittmann did not provide the medical information for participation in the program and the results of that decision gave rise to this action against Dittmann’s employer (ACS Human Services), his employer’s affiliate (Xerox Business Services, LLC), and an alleged agent of Dittmann’s employer (Quest Diagnostics, Inc.). Dittmann alleges violations…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Syed M. Alam v. Miller Brewing CompCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  5. Eddie Trail and Katrinka Trail v. Boys and Girls Clubs of Northwest IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gross v. The Peoples Gas Light and Coke CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. Taylor v. HixDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020
  3. Vazquez v. Allen County JailDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API