Taylor v. Hix
District Court, N.D. Indiana
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION JOSHUA TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:20-CV-604-DRL-MGG ELIZEBETH HIX, B GWILLIM, LYNNE FRYE, Defendants. OPINION & ORDER Joshua Taylor, a prisoner proceeding without a lawyer, filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the court must screen the complaint to determine whether it states a claim for relief. The court remains ever mindful that “[a] document filed pro se is to be liberally construed.” Erickson v. Pardus,
551 U.S. 89, 94
(2007) (citation omitted). Mr. Taylor alleges that on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tara Luevano v. Walmart Stores, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Mhammad Abu-Shawish v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Dan Richards v. Michael MitcheffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- David Gevas v. Christopher McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.