Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Hix

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided August 10, 2020No. 3:20-cv-00604Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION JOSHUA TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:20-CV-604-DRL-MGG ELIZEBETH HIX, B GWILLIM, LYNNE FRYE, Defendants. OPINION & ORDER Joshua Taylor, a prisoner proceeding without a lawyer, filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the court must screen the complaint to determine whether it states a claim for relief. The court remains ever mindful that “[a] document filed pro se is to be liberally construed.” Erickson v. Pardus,

551 U.S. 89, 94

(2007) (citation omitted). Mr. Taylor alleges that on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Tara Luevano v. Walmart Stores, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  3. Mhammad Abu-Shawish v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  4. Dan Richards v. Michael MitcheffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  5. David Gevas v. Christopher McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API