Legal Opinion

State v. Hancock

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 16, 2007No. 2006-186PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.

The defendant, Richard Hancock, appeals his conviction by a jury and his sentence in Superior Court (Barry, J.) for misdemeanor simple assault. See RSA 631:2-a (2007). We affirm in part, vacate in part and remand.

The jury could have found the following facts: Two probation officers arrested the defendant in his home for violating the terms of his probation. During transport to the house of correction, he threatened to sue the officers and assaulted one of them, Officer Donald Valente.

The defendant was charged with misdemeanor simple assault. Later, he sued Valente civilly. At trial, defense…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. BlackmerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  2. State v. DellorfanoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  3. State v. MountjoySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  4. Mortgage Specialists, Inc. v. DaveySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  5. Duquette v. Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. SiderisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  2. State v. PanarelloSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  3. State v. KaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
  4. State v. LamarcheSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  5. State v. OakesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API