Legal Opinion
The Cromar Company v. Nuclear Materials and Equipment Corporation and Atlantic Richfield Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 14, 1976No. 75-2053PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GARTH, Circuit Judge.
This private antitrust suit raises two questions for our consideration. The first concerns standing to maintain a Sherman Act § 2 monopolization claim. The second involves the admissibility of evidence to establish a Sherman Act § 1 conspiracy in restraint of trade claim arising from the termination of a contract. In contrast to the district court, we conclude that the plaintiff has standing under § 2 and that the plaintiff’s evidence was admissible with respect to its § 1 case. Hence, we reverse and remand for trial.
I
Plaintiff-appellant The Cromar…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Mid-West Paper Products Co. v. Continental Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Aaron Bravman v. Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. And Bassett Mirror Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Merican, Inc. And Merican Curtis, Inc. And Merican Curtis, Ltd. v. Caterpillar Tractor Co. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Gweldon Lee Paschall v. Kansas City Star Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.