Corrigan v. National Treasury Employees Union
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
Granting the Defendants’ Renewed Motions to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the renewed motions to dismiss filed by the defendants, the National Credit Union Administration (“the NCUA” or “the agency”), the National Treasury Employees Union (“the NTEU” or “the union”) and the Office of Personnel Management (“the OPM”). The union represents the agency’s employees in the collective bargaining process. The pro se plaintiff, an employee of the agency, commenced this action in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brookens v. GambleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Gulf South Communications, Inc. v. WOOF Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2021