State of Nevada Ex Rel. Shamberger v. United States
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, District Judge.
The question here involved is whether or not the Federal Government must first secure permission of and from a state agency — here the State Engineer’s Office — before it can make use of the ground or percolating water developed in its own wells, drilled at its own expense, upon its reserved lands constituting the Hawthorne Naval Ammunition Depot, situate about the Town of Hawthorne, Mineral County, Nevada. Or, to put the question another way, can the State of Nevada, at the instance of its State Engineer, enjoin the Federal Government from the use of the waters of its…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Public Util. Comm'n of Cal. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. McCrackenSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Federal Power Commission v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. CappaertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Lamb v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
- Brasher v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- United States v. GardnerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1995
- United States v. Francis Leo Cappaert, State of Nevada Ex Rel, Roland D. Westergard, State Engineer, Intervenor. United States of America v. Francis Leo Cappaert, State of Nevada Ex Rel. Roland d.westergard, State Engineer, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.