Legal Opinion

Golesh v. Utah Apex Mining Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1916No. 2922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. F. G. Loofbourow, Judge. Action by Eli Golesh against the Utah Apex Mining Company, a corporation. From a judgment sustaining defendant’s motion for nonsuit and dismissing the complaint, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

The plaintiff commenced this action against the defendant, a mining corporation, to recover damages for injuries which it is alleged the plaintiff sustained while working in defendant’s mine. The material facts, briefly stated, are as follows:

On the 14th day of May, 19.14, the plaintiff was in the employ of the defendant as timberman in its mine. It is conceded that the plaintiff at the time was a competent and experienced timberman, machineman and miner. Indeed, the *233plaintiff testified in Ms own behalf as an expert macMneman, quartz miner and timberman. On the date aforesaid the plaintiff,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chicago Anderson Pressed Brick Co. v. SobkowiakIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  2. McKee v. TourtellotteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  3. Knorpp v. WagnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  4. Showalter v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Thurman v. Pittsburg & Montana Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Russell v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Miller v. Utah Consol. Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Guitron v. Oregon Short Line R.Utah Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Urich v. Utah Apex Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API