Legal Opinion
Martinez v. James River Insurance Company
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided April 24, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01646Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 JUAN JOSE MARTINEZ, Case No.: 2:19-cv-01646-RFB-NJK 12 Plaintiff(s), Order 13 v. [Docket No. 21] 14 JAMES RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY, 15 Defendant(s). 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s amended motion to compel discovery responses. 17 Docket No. 21. Defendant filed a response in opposition. Docket No. 22. Plaintiff filed a reply. 18 Docket No. 23. The motion is properly resolved without a hearing. See Local Rule 78-1. For the 19 reasons discussed below, the motion is hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. 20 I.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Kor Media Group, LLC v. GreenDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2013
- Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- In Re Grand Jury Investigation. United States of America v. The Corporation 1Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.