Legal Opinion

Warner v. Kenny

California Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1946No. S. F. 17274PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Petitioners seek a writ of mandate to compel the respondent attorney general to forthwith issue a title and summary for a proposed initiative measure.

On October 15, 1945, petitioners submitted to the attorney general a draft of their proposed measure together with the required fee of $200, and requested the preparation of a title and summary (Elec. Code, §1401). No action was taken by the attorney general until January 2, 1946, when petitioners were notified by letter of his refusal to issue a title and summary on the ground that the measure was substantially the same as a measure which had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chesney v. ByramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Gage v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Uhl v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Gray v. KennyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. In Re CreglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Clements v. T. R. Bechtel Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Collins v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Armstrong v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Schmitz v. YoungerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API