Legal Opinion

Schmitz v. Younger

California Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1978No. L.A. 30844PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*92Opinion

CLARK, J.

Petitioner seeks writ of mandate to compel the Attorney General to title and prepare summary of a proposed initiative measure.

Petitioner submitted a proposed initiative measure to the Attorney General for title and summary preparatory to obtaining signatures to qualify the measure for the ballot. (See Elec. Code, §§ 3502, 3503.) The measure would (a) make it unlawful for any teacher to strike; (b) prohibit campaign contributions by teachers’ organizations; and (c) prevent tax revenues from being used to provide transportation for purpose of racially balancing public schools.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McFadden v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Perry v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Farley v. HealeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Warner v. KennyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Raven v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Brosnahan v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Fair Political Practices Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Harbor v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API