Legal Opinion

Board of County Commissioners v. Foster

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 10, 1923No. 24,354PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Original proceeding in mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an original proceeding in mandamus, to compel the state bank commissioner to issue a certificate against the state bank 'guaranty fund for $90,656.80, being the amount of the deposit of Barber county in the Lake State Bank at the time of its failure in November, 1921. Defendant contends that the writ should not be issued for two reasons: first, that the deposit was “otherwise secured” within the meaning of the bank guaranty law, and, second, that the rate of interest paid by the bank upon the deposit was larger than that approved -by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Selective Draft Law CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Engel v. O'MALLEYSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. First National Bank v. Fellows Ex Rel. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Schaake v. DolleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Boynton v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  2. Johnson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. Lake State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  4. State ex rel. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  5. Glenn v. CallahanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API