Legal Opinion
Romero v. Philip Morris, Inc.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided November 18, 2008No. 26,993PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALARID, Judge.
{1} This is an appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants on Plaintiffs’ claim that Defendants engaged in an unlawful conspiracy to fix the prices of cigarettes sold in New Mexico. We affirm the summary judgment in favor of Defendants Liggett and Lorillard; we reverse the summary judgment in favor of Defendants Philip Morris, Brown & Williamson, and R.J. Reynolds.
BACKGROUND
{2} Plaintiffs-Appellants are a statewide class of retail customers who purchased cigarettes manufactured by Defendants during an approximately seven-year period…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Romero v. Philip Morris Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- Flagstar Bank v. LichaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- Associated Home & RV Sales, Inc. v. Bank of BelenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Encinias v. Whitener Law Firm, P.A.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Encinias v. Whitener Law Firm, P.A.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.