Richard v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
AREND, Justice.
The appellant lost the sight in one of his eyes because, as he alleges in his amended complaint, the appellees, who are his employer and the employer’s insurance carrier, negligently, maliciously and in wanton disregard of his health delayed in providing him with necessary medical care. The prayer is for both compensatory and punitive damages. The appellees moved to dismiss the suit for failure of the appellant to state a claim upon which relief might be granted. It was their contention that the appellant’s exclusive remedy lay in a proceeding before the Alaska Workmen’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Yurkovich v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1957
- Cole v. Town of MiamiArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- Miller v. Aetna Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gordon v. Burgess Construction CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
- Vanderbilt University v. RussellTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
- Dwight v. Humana Hospital AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- Bohlmann v. Alaska Construction & Engineering, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Bockus v. First Student ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.