Legal Opinion

Richard v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1963No. 267PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AREND, Justice.

The appellant lost the sight in one of his eyes because, as he alleges in his amended complaint, the appellees, who are his employer and the employer’s insurance carrier, negligently, maliciously and in wanton disregard of his health delayed in providing him with necessary medical care. The prayer is for both compensatory and punitive damages. The appellees moved to dismiss the suit for failure of the appellant to state a claim upon which relief might be granted. It was their contention that the appellant’s exclusive remedy lay in a proceeding before the Alaska Workmen’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Yurkovich v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Cole v. Town of MiamiArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Miller v. Aetna Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Burgess Construction CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Vanderbilt University v. RussellTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Dwight v. Humana Hospital AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Bohlmann v. Alaska Construction & Engineering, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Bockus v. First Student ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API