Legal Opinion

Bohlmann v. Alaska Construction & Engineering, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 2009No. S-12553PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

To what extent must the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board inform or guide pro se claimants? Alaska Statute 23.30.110(c) requires denial of a workers’ compensation claim if the claimant does not file a request for a hearing within two years after the employer files a controversion notice. Pro se claimant Theodore Bohlmann filed his request for hearing August 31, 2005, slightly more than two years after his employer filed a notice of controversion on August 6, 2003. The board then denied his claim. Because the board should have corrected the employer’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Breck v. UlmerAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Prentzel v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Sopko v. Dowell Schlumberger, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Dougan v. Aurora Electric Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Barrington v. Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kelly v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Alaska State Commission for Human Rights v. United Physical Therapy, United Physical Therapy v. Alaska State Commission for Human RightsAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Apone v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API