Legal Opinion

Krutsinger v. Brown

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1880No. 7919PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Washington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— The material facts stated in the complaint may be thus summarized : Nathan Arnold procured Westley Brown to become surety for him upon two promissory notes, one executed to Peter C. Cauble, the other to Sallie Collier. To indemnify Brown, Arnold executed a mortgage conveying to the former certain real estate. Brown was compelled to pay, and did pay, the notes executed by him as surety for Arnold. Copies of the notes and mortgage are filed with the complaint, and a decree of foreclosure prayed. Krutsinger, the appellant, ivas made a defendant, and it was alleged, to quote from the complaint,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brinkmeyer v. BrownellerIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Brinkmeyer v. HelblingIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ulrich v. DrischellIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Bradway v. GroenendykeIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Axtel v. ChaseIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Laguna Drainage District v. Charles Martin Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907
  5. McFadden v. HopkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API