Wood v. . Wilder
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
The allegations of the complaint do not permit us — -at least for the purpose of this review — to regard the deed made to Mary Ballard and her husband as a separate, detached transaction, and to draw certain inferences from its form which, without attending circumstances, might defeat the action and sustain the demurrer. The plaintiffs allege that at the time this deed was made there were other deeds of similar purport and purpose executed and exchanged between the parties as a part of the same transaction — a transaction which, as they allege, explains and characterizes the deed under…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Harrison v. . RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
- Mallard v. . Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Sprinkle v. . SpainhourSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Cottrell v. GriffithsTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
- Speas v. . WoodhouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Craven County v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Honeycutt v. Citizens National Bank in GastoniaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Duckett v. . LydaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Wilson v. . ErvinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.