Legal Opinion
Robert C. Aparicio v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 30, 1996No. 95-3068PublishedCited by 108 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision granting judgment as a matter of law to defendant Norfolk & Western Railway Company after the close of Robert Aparicio’s case during the trial of his claim under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. §§ 51-60 (1988). Aparicio appeals the district court’s decision granting judgment as a matter of law to Norfolk & Western and raises two other issues on appeal. For the following reasons, we REVERSE in part and AFFIRM in part the decision of the district court and REMAND for retrial.
Beginning in 1976, Aparicio worked…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by108 opinions
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Myers v. Illinois Central RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Lynette Chapman v. The Higbee Company, D/B/A Dillard Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Daryl Monday v. Officer John Oullette and the City of MonroeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Gary W. Hardyman v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company Norfolk Southern Railway Company Cincinnati, New Orleans and Texas Pacific Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.