Legal Opinion

Lititz Mutual Insurance v. Bell

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 16, 1999No. 55, Sept. Term, 1998PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

This is a liability insurance coverage case that was decided in the circuit court on summary judgment. The case presents another effort by a tort plaintiff to avoid the operation of an exclusion for bodily injury that is expected or intended by the insured. Here the plaintiffs submission is that, due to a psychiatric disorder, the alleged insured had no intent to injure the plaintiff when the former struck the latter with his fist. As we explain below, this attempt to convert a battery into negligence fails on the facts and the law.

I

In December 1991, the alleged insured, John…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Brohawn v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. Ruvolo v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  4. Sheets v. Brethren Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  5. Allstate Insurance v. AtwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mesmer v. Maryland Automobile Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. American Family Insurance Co. v. WalserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  3. Blue Ridge Insurance v. PuigDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1999
  4. Standard Fire Insurance v. ProctorDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2003
  5. American Family Insurance Co. v. WalserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API