Legal Opinion
E-470 Public Highway Authority v. Kortum Investment Co., LLLP
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided August 11, 2005No. 04CA1262PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDailey, J.
In this eminent domain proceeding, respondents, Kortum Investment Company, LLLP and Patricia A. Castrodale (landowners), appeal the trial court’s order awarding them only part of the attorney fees they requested from petitioner, E-470 Public Highway Authority (E-470). The issue on appeal is whether landowners were entitled, under § 43-á-506(1)(h)(II)(B), C.R.S.2004, to attorney fees incurred after they rejected a written offer that was tendered by E-470 following the commencement of condemnation proceedings. Because we conclude that they were so entitled, we vacate the trial court’s order and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hendricks v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Town of Telluride v. Lot Thirty-Four Venture, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- A.C. Excavating v. Yacht Club II Homeowners Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Slack v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Showpiece Homes Corp. v. Assurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- E-470 Public Highway Authority v. RevenigColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Kauntz v. HCA-HEALTHONE, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- School District No. 12 v. Security Life of Denver Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- Kaercher v. SaterColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Thyssenkrupp Safway, Inc. v. Hyland Hills Parks & Recreation DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.