Legal Opinion

Martin Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 29, 1953No. Appeal, No. 259PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

The Unemployment Compensation Board of Review denied appellant’s claims for benefits, basing its decision xipon the referee’s findings of facts which it affirmed: “1. The claimant had been employed intermittently as a jig runner by the Morea Mining Company, Morea Colliery, Pennsylvania.- His last day of work was December 23, 1952, when he was laid off due to lack of work. 2. The claimant and his wife *414operate a bar and liquor establishment since September 1949. The liquor license issued by the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board is in the name of Andrew [appellant] and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sturdevant Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Keystone Mining Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Muchant Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Hatch v. Employment Security AgencyIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Johnson v. Board of Review of the Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Bernotas Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. FinnCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API