Martin Unemployment Compensation Case
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Reno, J.,
The Unemployment Compensation Board of Review denied appellant’s claims for benefits, basing its decision xipon the referee’s findings of facts which it affirmed: “1. The claimant had been employed intermittently as a jig runner by the Morea Mining Company, Morea Colliery, Pennsylvania.- His last day of work was December 23, 1952, when he was laid off due to lack of work. 2. The claimant and his wife *414operate a bar and liquor establishment since September 1949. The liquor license issued by the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board is in the name of Andrew [appellant] and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sturdevant Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Keystone Mining Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
3Cited by16 opinions
- Muchant Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Hatch v. Employment Security AgencyIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
- Johnson v. Board of Review of the Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1958
- Bernotas Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. FinnCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.