State v. Cochran
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment as of nonsuit as to felonious breaking and entering because there was insufficient evidence of intent to commit larceny. In ruling on a motion to nonsuit the court is to consider evidence in the light most favorable to the State and give the State the benefit of every reasonable inference. State v. Bell, 285 N.C. 746, 208 S.E. 2d 506 (1974). If there is more than a scintilla of competent evidence to support the allegations of the indictment, the court must submit the case to the jury. State v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. AccorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. RankinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. LovelaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. BronsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Mill-Power Supply Co. v. CVM ASSOCIATESCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990