Conly v. Overholser
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; B. F. Burwell, Judge Action by Edgar L. Conly for a writ of mandamus against Ed. Overholser and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
In this action the plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, made application to the district court of Oklahoma county 'for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the defendants in error, as the board of county commissioners of Oklahoma county, to grant him a license to sell intoxicating liquors in Oklahoma City. The defendants demurred to the petition hied below, which demurrer was sustained and the writ refused. From the order refusing the issuance of the writ the plaintiff took the case by petition in error to the Supreme Court of the territory of Oklahoma, and it was transferred to this court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Parker v. Territory Ex Rel. BostickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. TerritorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Freeman v. Board of Medical Examiners for Southern District of Indian TerritorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Harman v. BurtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Burkhalter v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
3Cited by3 opinions
- Albright v. EricksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Hodges v. SchaferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Carney v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925