Legal Opinion

Carney v. Brown

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 5, 1925No. 15693PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, C.

There are 12 assignments of error in the petition in error, but all are comprehended and presented under two propositions stated in the brief of plaintiff in error thus:(1) The district court was without jurisdiction to enter the so-called “order taxing costs.”(2) The county court had exclusive jurisdiction to order the payment of the several items herein complained of.

These propositions will be considered in inverse order. It is disclosed by the record that the guardian, H. R. Brown, paid to the district court referee the sum of $250 as directed by the district court,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Friend, Co. Atty. v. CummingsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Greer County Election Board v. ElliottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Provens v. RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Jones v. EastSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Conly v. OverholserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Anderson-Prichard Refining Corp. v. Board of County Comm'rsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API