Legal Opinion
In re Cedar Shake & Shingle Antitrust Litigation
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided February 20, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00288Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 CASE NO. C19-288 MJP 10 IN RE CEDAR SHAKES AND SHINGLES ANTITRUST LITIGATION ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS 11 12 This Document Relates to: 13 ALL CLASS ACTIONS 14 The above-entitled Court, having received and reviewed: 15 1. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Class Action Complaints (Dkt. No. 16 102), Class Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Second Amended 17 Class Action Complaints (Dkt. No. 105), and Defendants’ Reply on Motion to 18 Dismiss Second Amended Class Action…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Loredana Ranza v. Nike, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.