Legal Opinion

State v. Reavley

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 2003No. 03-179PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 The State appeals the District Court’s suppression of statements Alan Reavley (Reavley) made to law enforcement authorities and of a recorded conversation between Reavley and Mary Klesh (Klesh). We reverse.

¶2 The two issues on appeal are as follows:

¶3 1. Whether the District Court erred in granting Reavley’s motion to suppress the statements that Reavley made to law enforcement?

¶4 2. Whether the District Court erred in granting Reavley’s motion to suppress the recorded conversation between Reavley and Klesh?

Factual and Procedural Background

¶5 Following a suppression hearing, the District…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. GoetzMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. BuckMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. LaceyMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. BrinsonMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State of Iowa v. John Arthur Senn Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API