Legal Opinion
Hilst v. Bowen
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 4, 1989No. 87-2755PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Per curiam
Wilbur Hilst, a physician, commenced this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (1982) and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), alleging that his constitutional right to due process was violated by the manner in which he was suspended from participation in the Medicare reimbursement program. He requested actual damages of over $10,000 from Defendant Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services. The district court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss for *726lack of subject matter…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Schweiker v. ChilickySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Larez v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Sue C. Wagoner, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Robert J. Wagoner, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Brumark Corp. v. Samson Resources Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Lopez v. Long (In Re Long)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- George W. Jurgens and Margaret M. Jurgens, Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. Timothy McKasy D/B/A Tonka Marketing and Cbk, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.