Legal Opinion
Sacramento Typographical U. No. 46 v. St. of Calif
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 9, 1971No. Civ. 12190PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JANES, J.
Defendant State of California appeals from the judgment in a class action filed by plaintiff union and its officers on behalf of members of the union who are hourly wage employees of the state at its printing plant in Sacramento.
The action was for declaratory relief. The judgment held, inter alia, that the printing plant employees were entitled to the same paid holidays as are generally allowed to state employees under section 18025 of the Government Code. Defendant attacks this aspect of the judgment.
Upon its enactment in 1945, former section 13581 provided that “At no time…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cal. Drive-In Restaurant Assn. v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Louis Stores, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Trabue Pittman Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Meyer v. Board of Trustees of San Dieguito Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Estate of Simmons v. TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Tillie Lewis Foods, Inc. v. City of PittsburgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Livingston v. HeydonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- In Re PhilpottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Acebo v. Real Estate Education, Research & Recovery FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984