Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Philpott

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 24, 1985No. Docket Nos. B008116, B008117PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LILLIE, P. J.

In these consolidated cases, George Aubrey Philpott and Daniel Lee Kennedy each seeks immediate release by way of petition for writ of habeas corpus, asserting that his present incarceration in state prison pursuant to parole revocation exceeds the 12-month maximum confinement set forth in Penal Code section 3057, subdivision (a). On each petition we issued order to show cause. For the reasons hereinafter stated, we deny each petition and discharge the order to show cause.

I

In re Philpott, No. B008116

Following conviction of attempted burglary, Philpott was sentenced to 18…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Sacramento Typographical U. No. 46 v. St. of CalifCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. In Re SchaeferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Terhune v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Cox v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. In Re ValentiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. COX v. McCARTHYCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. In Re BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API