Legal Opinion

Rutgard v. Haynes

District Court, S.D. California

Decided April 27, 1999No. Civ. 98-0524TW(JFS)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*597ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL [48-1]

STIVEN, United States Magistrate Judge.

I

INTRODUCTION

Defendant’s Motion to Compel Production of Files of Attorney Gene Royce in the above-referenced case was heard before Magistrate Judge Stiven in Courtroom E on April 13, 1999. Attorneys Krista Sandler and Mike Leone appeared on behalf of Defendant. Attorney William Cohan appeared on behalf of Plaintiff. Having read the written submissions of the parties, heard argument of counsel, and being fully advised, the Court FINDS and ORDERS as follows:

II

BACKGROUND

Defendant seeks, by subpoena,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hearn v. RhayDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1975
  2. Handgards, Inc. v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1976
  3. Pappas v. HollowayWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Jakobleff v. Cerrato, Sweeney & CohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Bird v. Penn Central Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Parler & Wobber v. Miles & Stockbridge, P.C.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Zabin v. PicciottoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
  3. Fischel & Kahn, Ltd. v. Van Straaten Gallery, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Madanes v. MadanesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  5. Simmons Foods, Inc. v. WillisDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API